Saturday, October 24, 2015

The Intern (2015)

Rating: • • (out of 5)
Age Recommendation: 10+
Based on the previews, I thought I was going to enjoy The Intern (2015).  I'm not a huge De Niro fan, but I've generally enjoyed his comedy roles.  The premise looked cute: a senior citizen working as an intern at a fashion company.  And it did have cute parts... but ultimately this movie was disappointingly slow-moving and dreary.

Robert De Niro and Anne Hathaway did fine in their roles as charming old man and hectic businesswoman.  His humorously overly-expressive face even received comment within the movie.  The acting was fine; it's what surrounded the acting that made this film a disappointment.

Problem number one was stretching out the first half.  There was no real enemy and no real goal.  The entire cast of characters had one emotion: mild amusement at the unusual premise of an old intern and the generation gap between twenty-somethings and seventy-somethings.  Even the music was lackluster. Pretty much every funny scene from the trailer was in the first half of the movie, and pretty much every funny scene in the movie was in the trailer--with one huge exception.  Right near the end of that first half we got one truly funny scene involving a misaddressed e-mail.  I feel like the whole audience perked up during this scene and shook off the sleepiness that had fallen.

The tone of the second half did a 180.  Our lighthearted but lengthy introduction gave way to a surprisingly depressing second half.  A villain--of sorts--was introduced and the previously foreshadowed problem of finding a CEO actually came to the forefront.  De Niro continued to be a perfect (and perfectly charming) intern and gave advice and handkerchiefs to everyone without ever needing any for himself.  He mentioned his deceased wife only once, I think, and seemed to be completely over her (in spite of having loved her for 20-odd years).  The man didn't have any flaws--not even have health issues, which I fully expected to pop up à la Grumpy Old Men (1993).

Anyway, when we finally got to the end, I actually turned to my family members and asked, "Is that it?" because, in spite of its incredible length, I found the ending dissatisfying.  A scene that was presented as romantic was, in fact, anti-romantic.  I don't want to spoil it, but I will say that feminists will probably have a conniption.

Ultimately this movie fell apart because it didn't know what it was. A light drama? A heavy comedy? (Is that a thing?)  The preachiness about how the "old way" was better gets repetitive.  The other elderly interns are completely forgotten--where did they go?  Anne Hathaway's character's daughter has some really dumb lines.  There are far too many jokes about De Niro's character's libido--yet they are mild enough that a child would just say "why is the old man making those strange moaning noises?"  The second half is depressing.  Yet, in spite of all of these flaws, the acting is solid.

Summary: I'm not saying to avoid this movie, but I'm not saying you need to go see it, either.  If you choose to, just be warned that it is slow and it masquerades as feminist but really isn't (if that sort of thing bothers you).  You can take the whole family, but it's definitely not aimed at kids, and I don't think they would appreciate it.  There are some cute moments hidden within, and some well-acted dramatic scenes, but just know it is not the comedy that was advertised.

The Good: comedic De Niro faces, some clever lines, dramatic acting by Anne Hathaway, e-mail scene, cute characters
The Bad: long, slow, recycled jokes, poorly written little girl
The Even Worse: depressing end

Sunday, April 6, 2014

Captain America: The Winter Soldier (2014)

Rating: • • • • (out of 5)
Age Recommendation: 5+
In all honesty, I wasn't super excited about the new Cap'n movie coming out.  The previews were kind of blah and after The Avengers (2012), I was sick of S.H.I.E.L.D.  Lucky for me, so is Captain America.  When it's all said and done, does Captain America: The Winter Soldier (2014) have an excess of vehicular pile-ups and explosions?  You bet!  But it also has the nostalgic charm of our titular superherothat's Captain America, not the Winter Soldier, for those of you who are unfamiliar with Marvelthat I love.

Those of you who have seen the Captain's previous two flicks will recognize some familiar faces.  The Black Widow, aka Natasha Romanoff (Scarlett Johansson) is back, this time in a larger role than either Iron Man 2 (2010) or The Avengers as she gets to know the Cap, aka Steve Rogers (Chris Evans) a lot betterbut in a child-friendly way.  If she doesn't get her own movie, at least she gets a lot more screen timesomething the male audiences will especially appreciate.  S.H.I.E.L.D.'s eyepatched director Nick Fury (Samuel L. Jackson) plays a key role despite being absent for most of the film for reasons that I won't spoil here.  Cobie Smulders, whose character probably has a name, returns as a familiar face for How I Met Your Mother aficionados.  Community fans will also recognize Danny Pudi in an inexplicable cameo.  Of course, Stan Lee has a cameo per Marvel tradition, and although his costume makes it hard to see his face, I'm sure you will have no trouble picking him out if you've seen him before.

One returning character you are supposed to recognize is the "Winter Soldier," and while the actor is apparently the same one seen in Captain America: The First Avenger (2011), the change in hair and makeup made said character unrecognizable to me, even in flashbacks.  Funnily enough, this character plays a rather minor role in the grand scheme of things.

For the first time in my memory of Marvel movies, the end credit scenesthat's right, there are two again, as with Thor: The Dark World (2013)are not worth the wait.  Still, the movie is a fun ride that sucks you in from the start.  It catches newcomers to the franchise up without slowing everything down.  The plot is generally cohesive without being overly predictable.  Thankfully, we are spared constant referencing of The Avengers, allowing the Captain to thrive on his own.  As with Iron Man 3 (2013), one of our other post-Avengers Avenger movies, our hero(es) abandon their iconic garb and go undercover for a while.  Some viewers may find this annoying, but I enjoy seeing superheroes trying to fit in as civilians just as I enjoy seeing celebrities being themselves.

We also get a new superhero of sorts, a military man who also probably has a name.  He is played not by Will Smith, as my parents thought from the previews, but by Anthony Mackie.  He turns out to be a pretty capable partner for the Captain in terms of both zingers and cool accessories.  Natasha is up to her usual badassery, with a bit of dry humor thrown in.

Oh, and Robert Redford is in the movie.  Don't want to give away any more than that.

Summary: If you're expecting Oscar-worthy drama or philosophical mumbo-jumbo, look elsewhere.  This is a blockbuster.  It is meant to entertain the masses, and that is what it does.  It throws a few emotional moments at you, but the main point is to have a good time watching crazy stunts and big machines and explosions (and numerous crashes of what appear to be empty cars, I might add) and going along for the thrill ride that is life as Captain America in the 21st century.  Kid-friendly movie in terms of language, violence, and sexuality.

The Good: get to know Black Widow better, less S.H.I.E.L.D. (sort of), new sidekick, Captain Frickin' America!
The Bad: title misleading in terms of plot focus, one returning actor unrecognizable
The Even Worse: crummy end credits sequences

Friday, December 13, 2013

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug (2013)

Rating: • • • ½ (out of 5)
Age Recommendation: 10+
It's finally here; Peter Jackson's second installment in the Hobbit trilogy hit theaters late last night.  Naturally, I couldn't stay away.  Now I'm someone who tries not to judge a book by its cover; likewise, I try not to judge a movie by its book.  I try to treat source novels and their adaptations as separate but related entities rather than dwelling too much on the adaptation being "right" or "wrong."  That being said, for those novel purists, you will probably have a fit when you see The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug (2013).  I've only ever read The Hobbit twice, the most recent time being in preparation for The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey (2012), but I was surprised at how many plot alterations I noticed and can't help but discuss some of these differences here. 

I knew there would be changes.  I'm pretty sure everyone with any interest in the series did.  I'd read in Entertainment Weekly about this new elf girl "Tauriel" (Evangeline Lilly), so I was prepared for that addition, controversial though she may be.  I honestly was fine with Tauriel's role which, although largely predictable, might surprise and even disappoint some viewers when it comes to romantic developments.  If anything, her character is underdeveloped.

I was also prepared for Legolas (Orlando Bloom) showing up.  Although I suspect the inclusion of Legolas has more to do with Orlando Bloom's huge fangirl following, I agree with Jackson's logic that Legolas might very well have been in the Mirkwood when Bilbo and the dwarves passed through; after all, his father is King Thranduil (Lee Pace), who plays an important--but somehow very subdued--part in this movie.  The real benefit of adding Tauriel and Legolas is for the ridiculous fight sequences.  You thought Legolas skateboarding down steps on a shield was silly?  Or how about that time he slid down a dying oliphaunt's trunk?  These stunts are mere child's play compared to the humorous spectacle of butt-kicking Legolas and Tauriel delight viewers with.

I'm not saying the dwarves don't have their moments of physical humor (one in particular comes in mind, in the midst of the elves showing off), but the elves really steal the show whenever they pop up, which is a lot more frequently than those who have read the book might expect.  After a brief flashback and nod to The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (2001) to summarize the purpose of Thorin's (Richard Armitage) quest, complete with the town of Bree and another carrot-eating Jackson cameo, we jump right into the thick of things.  Bilbo (Martin Freeman), Gandalf (Ian McKellen), and the dwarves are on the run from the orcs (or are they goblins?) and their giant wolf steeds known as wargs... which is kind of where we left off, only with no mention of the eagles that saved the day.

Next we come to the "Tom Bombadil" of The Hobbit, Beorn. I call him that because I understand this shape-shifting bear-man to be yet another beloved fan-favorite who could easily have been left out of the movie.  This time, though, Jackson learned his lesson and left Beorn in, though I'll be curious to hear other viewers' reactions.  Despite not being a novel purists, I was slightly bummed by the treatment of Beorn.  For one thing, while being described as large and hairy, I don't recall Tolkien describing a weird nose.  As with the centaurs in The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe (2005), the extra make-up on Beorn bothered me; I think creatures that are supposed to have human features should have human features.  Instead, Beorn looks a lot like Raw from the Tin Man (2007) mini-series, which bothered me for all of the minute we got to look at him.  While glad he was included, I was also irked by the removal of one of the book's cuter scenes, the clever way Gandalf tricks Beorn (who hates dwarves) into hosting the whole group.  Furthermore, there is very little explanation of this character and his strange lifestyle to those who haven't read the book, which might make Beorn's inclusion confusing.

On to the Mirkwood, the creepy old forest.  Instead of the weeks of travel the original story describes, the dwarves and hobbit (Gandalf is off doing his own thing at this point, with a return of Radagast) quickly start hallucinating and give up.  As a result, we miss out on two more scenes I was looking forward to: one involving Bombur and a stream, and the other involving feasting elves.  As every evil forest in the history of fantasy seems to include, the Mirkwood has its giant spiders, though Bilbo is a lot less sneaky than he could be now that he has discovered the Ring's powers.  Immediately after, we jump to the capture by Thranduil's elves.  With the exception of the spider fight, these early-movie scenes all seem downplayed in importance--like they are mere nuisances rather than real dilemmas for Bilbo to solve.  In fact, everything up to this point seems skimmed over.

Moving on, the party finds its way into the care of Bard (Luke Evans), who has been styled as a Will Turner (Bloom's character in the Pirates of the Caribbean franchise) look-alike.  Here we get a lot of dull repetition of the words "barge," "Bard," and things to the effect of "rebel" or "rabble-rouser" to explain the Master of Laketown's (Stephen Fry) distaste for the man.  The most interesting thing about the Master is his hair, which is hideous on a level to rival the orcs.  This whole segment is rather dull, as the Lonely Mountain is now in view yet we must wait to see Smaug, but Jackson switches things up by leaving three dwarves in the town and throwing in some rather pointless elves and orcs.  Kili (Aidan Turner), as the most attractive dwarf, even gets his own little story line which references events from The Fellowship of the Ring and overshadows Bilbo at times.

Finally, we get to see the legendary Smaug.  As with his encounter with Gollum in the previous film, Bilbo finds himself using wordplay as a defense--this time against a giant dragon.  This was well done, but I wanted even more.  There are plenty of fight scenes that could have been cut to make room for more brilliant dialogue.  Still, it is only once the Lonely Mountain is reached that viewers finally get to see a decent amount of Bilbo, who has been largely ignored throughout the movie if he is the central character as I believe him to be, before throwing in some final, somewhat confusing action sequences.  As for the special effects, I am very pleased with the appearance of Smaug who, unlike the excessively ugly CG orcs, could not have been produced with mere makeup.

If you're still reading this, you're probably thinking, "Gee, Cinema Steph sure has a lot to gripe about--sounds like she didn't like this movie."  That's not the case.  Despite all my nitpicking, this is a movie that does what I like in a movie: it tells a story, and it entertains.  This movie stands fairly well for part two of a trilogy.  The Desolation of Smaug leaves me wanting to watch part three, while sustaining a climax and conclusion of its own.  Sure, there's very little prologue, and sure, I thought Bilbo should have more lines, but overall I am satisfied with movie.

Summary: There are several small to moderate changes for book purists to debate, but The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug is full of the adventure we look for in these movies.  The stunts are extreme to the point of silliness, the orcs are uglier than ever, and the role of the titular hobbit seems diminished, but the spectacle remains entertaining.  What isn't an obvious nod to The Fellowship of the Ring is for the most part delightfully fresh, and I recommend this film to anyone with any interest in fantasy adventures who can handle the sight of a decapitated orc, especially if you saw An Unexpected Journey.  If you have any interest in the series, go ahead and see it in theaters.

The Good: humorous action sequences, engaging story, lovable Bilbo, dragon CG and design nearly perfect, some witty lines
The Bad: soundtrack less memorable, predictable romantic developments, not enough Bilbo, Laketown seems like the plot stalls
The Even Worse: skims over or leaves out memorable parts of book, excessively grotesque orcs

Saturday, November 2, 2013

If you like Stephanie's Cinematic Say-So...

Please check out my series of Disney reviews at stephsmoviemusings.blogspot.com and my review of Gravity (2013) on YouTube here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZp-Nstjsh8 (more to come!!!).